Emissions Trading and the Economic Impact of the Paris Agreement on New Zealand

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Mario Fernandez Adam Daigneault

Resumen

A new international climate change agreement under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change was concluded in Paris in December 2015. The Paris Agreement (PA) asserts that greenhouse gases (GHG) emission pathways should be consistent with holding the increase in global temperature below 1.5°C or 2°C above pre-industrial levels. New Zealand (NZ) has committed to reduce emissions to 30% below 2005 levels by 2030. The purpose of this paper is to estimate the economic costs from the PA terms when the mitigation potential relies on pricing/not pricing agricultural emissions and linking/not linking the NZ Emissions Tradable Scheme (NZ ETS) to other markets of emissions permits in Australia, the European Union and the United States. Through a general equilibrium model we find that NZ is capable of meeting the PA terms; however, GDP decreases by 7% below the baseline by 2030 because of the stringency of the targets. Although pricing agriculture and linking the NZ ETS to other emissions markets mitigates losses, linking to the European Union ETS may not be desirable because of significant losses on competitiveness. Results also show that linking to Australia or the US emissions markets mitigates compliance costs because of lower prices on emissions permits.  

Palabras clave

Market linking, agricultural emissions, general equilibrium

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Citas

Alexeeva, Victoria, and Niels Anger. 2015. “The Globalization of the Carbon Market: Welfare and Competitiveness Effects of Linking Emissions Trading Schemes.” Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, January. doi:10.1007/s11027-014-9631-y.

Anger, N., B. Brouns, and J. Onigkeit. 2009. “Linking the EU Emissions Trading Scheme: Economic Implications of Allowance Allocation and Global Carbon Constraints.” Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 14 (5): 379–98. doi:10.1007/s11027-009-9180-y.

Anger, Niels. 2008. “Emissions Trading beyond Europe: Linking Schemes in a Post-Kyoto World.” Energy Economics 30 (4): 2028–49. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2007.08.002.

Babiker, M, R Reilly, and L Viguier. 2004. “Is International Emissions Trading Always Beneficial? On JSTOR.” The Energy Journal 25 (2): 33–56. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41323030?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Babiker, Mustafa, Angelo Gurgel, Sergey Paltsev, and John Reilly. 2008. “MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis.” System. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/44618.

Balassa, Bela. 1965. “Trade Liberalisation and ‘Revealed’ Comparative Advantage.” The Manchester School 33 (2): 99–123. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x.

Burfisher, Mary E. 2011. Introduction to Computable General Equilibrium Models. Cambridge University Press.

Climathe Change Information. 2012. “New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme.” Agriculture’s Obligations. https://www.climatechange.govt.nz/emissions-trading-scheme/participating/agriculture/obligations/.

Dellink, Rob B. 2005. Modelling the Costs of Environmental Policy: A Dynamic Applied General Equilibrium Assessment. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Dellink, Rob, Stéphanie Jamet, Jean Château, and Romain Duval. 2010. “Towards Global Carbon Pricing.” OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/5km975t0cfr8-en.

Doda, Baran, and Luca Taschini. 2015. “Carbon Dating: When Is It Beneficial to Link ETSs?” SSRN Electronic Journal, January. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2610076.

Fæhn, Taran, Elisabeth Isaksen, Karl Jacobsen, and Birger Strøm. 2013. “MSG-TECH: Analysis and Documentation of a General Equilibrium Model with Endogenous Climate Technology Adaptations.” Report 47: 2013.

Fernandez, M, and Adam Daigneault. 2015. “The Climate Mitigation, Adaptation and Trade in Dynamic General Equilibrium (CLIMAT-DGE) Model.” Landcare Research Contract report, Auckland, New Zealand.

Flachsland, Christian, Robert Marschinski, and Ottmar Edenhofer. 2009a. “Global Trading versus Linking: Architectures for International Emissions Trading.” Energy Policy 37 (5): 1637–47. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.008.

Flachsland, Christian, Robert Marschinski, and Ottmar Edenhofer. 2009b. “To Link or Not to Link: Benefits and Disadvantages of Linking Cap-and-Trade Systems.” Climate Policy 9 (4). Taylor & Francis Group: 358–72. doi:10.3763/cpol.2009.0626.

Gruell, Georg, and Luca Taschini. 2012. “Linking Emission Trading Schemes: A Short Note.” Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy 1 (3): 31–38. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1546105.

Jaffe, J, and RN Stavins. 2007. “Linking Tradable Permit Systems for Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Opportunities, Implications, and Challenges - Harvard - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.” http://belfercenter.hks.harvard.edu/publication/17770/linking_tradable_permit_systems_for_greenhouse_gas_emissions.html.

Kerr, Suzi, and Andrew Sweet. 2008. “Inclusion of Agriculture in a Domestic Emissions Trading Scheme: New Zealand's Experience to Date.” Farm Policy Journal 5 (4): 19–29.

Klepper, Gernot, and Sonja Peterson. 2004. “The EU Emissions Trading Scheme Allowance Prices, Trade Flows and Competitiveness Effects.” European Environment 14 (4): 201–18. doi:10.1002/eet.356.

Lanzi, Elisa, Damian Mullaly, Jean Château, and Rob Dellink. 2013. “Addressing Competitiveness and Carbon Leakage Impacts Arising from Multiple Carbon Markets.” OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/5k40ggjj7z8v-en.

Malmberg, Anders, and Peter Maskell. 2007. “Towards an Explanation of Regional Specialization and Industry Agglomeration.” European Planning Studies 5 (1): 25–41. doi:10.1080/09654319708720382.

McKibbin, Warwick J., Robert Shackleton, and Peter J. Wilcoxen. 1999. “What to Expect from an International System of Tradable Permits for Carbon Emissions.” Resource and Energy Economics 21 (3-4): 319–46. doi:10.1016/S0928-7655(99)00007-X.

Ministry for the Environment. 2015. “New Zealand’s Greenhouse Gas Inventory 1990-2013.”

Paltsev, Sergey, John M Reilly, Henry D Jacoby, Richard S Eckaus, James Mcfarland, Marcus Sarofim, Malcolm Asadoorian, Mustafa Babiker, and Report No. 2005. “MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change ( EPPA ) Model : Version 4.” Policy Analysis Report No: 78.

Rutherford, Thomas. 1999. “Applied General Equilibrium Modeling with MPSGE as a GAMS Subsystem: An Overview of the Modeling Framework and Syntax.” Computational Economics 14: 1–46. doi:10.1023/A:1008655831209.
UNFCC. 2015. “Paris Agreement, FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1.” http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf.